Computing
The Greater Chinese Motherboard Industry, 3Q 2002 and Beyond
November 13, 2002 / Stanley Su
32 Page, Statistics Report
US$1,280 (Single User License)

Abstract

With exceptionally low back-to-school purchases, shipment volume growth in the Greater Chinese motherboard industry in the third quarter of 2002 was slightly lower than originally anticipated. With no clear sign of global economic recovery, corporate IT expenditures are likely to remain low, and shipment volume growth in the fourth quarter will not be as high as in previous years. Average selling price will continue to fall over the coming year, partly because the Pentium 4 will remain the mainstream platform over the next 12 months. Additionally, with the limited ability for newer products to stimulate market demand, new product prices are unlikely to increase. At the same time, first tier maker profit margins will likely continue to fall as competition for market share in such a mature industry will result in intensifying price competition. In the third quarter, there was a significant disparity between the shipment volume of the leading international PC vendors and that of the Greater Chinese motherboard manufacturers, reflecting that leading PC vendors were excessively optimistic in their forecasts for the third quarter; this low demand will affect the shipment volume of the Greater Chinese motherboard manufacturers in the fourth quarter. In addition to a review of the Greater Chinese motherboard industry in the third quarter of 2002, this report will explore the competitive advantages of Intel as well as the likely contributors to the continued fall of ASP. The Greater Chinese motherboard industry encompasses makers from Taiwan, China, and Hong Kong that produce motherboards in Taiwan, China, and Mexico. The motherboards discussed in this report are only intended for use in x86 architecture desktop PCs  rather than notebook PCs or servers.
  •  List of Topics
  •  List of Figures
  •  List of Tables

Intel Outmaneuvering Competition

Formerly, CPU speed increased steadily due to Intel's advanced production process technology; however, such increases in speed are encountering certain obstacles. The main restriction on CPU speed is clock frequency during actual operation: increases in clock frequency result in large amounts of thermal energy, which ultimately hinder computer system stability, add to heat dissipation costs, and exacerbate energy consumption.

Intel's adoption of Hyper-Threading Technology will have a significant impact the development and competitiveness of future CPUs. The launch of this technology is the first time Intel has emphasized that improvement in CPU performance does not necessitate increases in clock frequency; Intel has long focused on clock frequency in the company's competition with AMD.

There has been no major revolution in software applications over the last few years. While increasing CPU speed may help to boost competitive advantages within the CPU industry, it does not do much to stimulate market demand. Intel's promotion of Hyper-Threading Technology will ensure that future competition in the CPU industry will be focused on performance and quality rather than clock frequency, and also indicates Intel has accepted that increasing clock frequency is unlikely to stimulate market demand at present. Future PC key component production will focus on adding CPU functions such as integrated Hyper Threading and integrated wireless LAN to boost differentiation. Software companies would subsequently be able to exploit added CPU functionality to develop innovative new applications, which would then stimulate PC demand.

Intel's strategy shows that the company is starting to undertake more precise segmentation of CPU utilization, as is exemplified by the development of the Banias CPU targeting the mobile PC market. Intel's strategy poses a threat to competitors; companies such as AMD do not have the resources needed to develop a wide range of CPUs for different uses. At the same time, Intel's strategy will continue to raise the entry barriers of the mobile PC market, which holds especially high growth potential.

In the desktop PC market, large volume shipments of AMD's next generation Claw Hammer will not begin until the second half of 2003. With Intel continually launching new CPUs, AMD's Athlon will gradually be forced out of the medium and high-end market and into the value-line market before mass production of the Claw Hammer begins. Duron may be forced to withdraw from the market altogether as prices are being pushed down below cost. Although the value-line market is well suited to AMD's products, low profit margins will affect AMD's competitiveness and reduce the resources available to AMD for the development of new products.

Average Unit Price Will Continue to Fall

Although Intel will be launching new chipsets in the fourth quarter of 2002, prices will not be very high. Additionally, Intel is still trying to liquidate inventories of old chipsets, such as the 845S. Finally, first tier motherboard manufacturers have been reducing prices to take market share away from second tier makers. It is therefore anticipated that the Greater Chinese motherboard industry's ASP will continue to fall in the fourth quarter.

Furthermore, no significant increase in ASP is anticipated over the coming 12 months, mainly because the Pentium 4 will remain the mainstream product over the coming year. With motherboards having reached a high level of maturity, the price of components will fall. Most of the first tier manufacturers have profit margins of around 10% to 14%. Given the limited growth of market demand first tier manufacturers will focus on seizing second tier market share; prices could thus fall yet further.

List of Companies

 

Acer

 

宏碁

Ali

 

揚智

AMD

 

 

ANCO Computer

 

羅禮電腦

Aopen

 

建碁

ASUS

 

華碩

Biostar

 

映泰

Chaintech

 

承啟

Dell

 

 

ECS

 

精英

FIC

 

大眾

Flextronics

 

 

Fujitsu

 

 

Gateway

 

 

Gigabyte

 

 技嘉

Hon Hai/Foxconn

 

鴻海

HP

 

 

IBM

 

 

Intel

 

 

Kentron

 

 

Legend

 

聯想

LG

 

 

Medion

 

 

Microstar

 

 

Mitac

 

神基

NEC

 

 

nVidia

 

 

QDI

 

 

SIS

 

矽統

Sony

 

 

Tyan

 

 泰安

USI

 

環隆電氣

VIA

 

威盛

Wistron

 

緯創

To get MIC's complete insight, please log in.