Computing
The Greater Chinese Notebook PC Industry, 1H 2002 and Beyond
July 25, 2002 / Wen-tang Chen / Charles Chou
48 Page, Statistics Report
US$1,680 (Single User License)

Abstract

Despite less than ideal market conditions in Western Europe and North America in the second quarter of 2002, the Greater Chinese notebook PC industry posted 35% year-on-year growth in shipment volume and a 17% increase in shipment value. The average selling price of notebook PCs continued to plummet as Greater Chinese manufacturers further dropped prices and brand-name makers adjusted their component purchasing strategies to cut overall costs. Along with the implementation of more streamlined customs procedures, the second quarter also saw increasing concentration of production in China following the completion production facilities there; increased shipments of value-line products from that country further contributed to lower average selling price. The sustained growth of desktop solutions notebook PCs also sparked a rebound in own-brand shipments as Greater Chinese makers seek to penetrate the Chinese market. In OEM business, desktop solutions notebook PC production and a change in the structure of orders led to some significant changes in industry rankings, with Compal taking over the top spot from Quanta. In addition to a review of the Greater Chinese notebook PC industry in the first half of 2002, this report will examine the future movements of Japanese and Korean makers, as well as discuss the impact of intensifying price competition on the future of the Greater Chinese notebook PC industry.
  •  List of Topics
  •  List of Figures
  •  List of Tables

Orders from North America and Western Europe account for a much higher share of Greater Chinese notebook PC production than orders from Japan; previously, 100% of outsourcing from HP and Apple was given to Greater Chinese makers. If North American and Western European vendors are unable to maintain steady sales growth, the number of orders going to Greater Chinese manufacturers will be unable to go beyond its current level. Given the smaller percentage of outsourcing given to Taiwanese makers by Japanese vendors, orders from this country will provide growth opportunities for the Greater Chinese notebook PC industry in the future.

If Japanese makers decide to expand production sites in China, during such a period of transition, Japanese makers will execute test runs with small-scale orders from Taiwanese manufacturers. Finally, Japanese makers will only produce one spindle models in Japan, as well as undertake final assembly, for the domestic market. For Taiwanese manufacturers seeking orders from Japanese makers, competition with factories built by Japanese manufacturers in China will restrict future growth.

Leading international notebook PC vendors will gradually start to release more orders to Korean notebook PC makers. Greater Chinese manufacturers currently account for approximately 60% of the world's notebook PC production, and vendors will start outsourcing to Korean companies in order to diversify their supplier portfolios and thereby reduce the risks inherent on depending heavily on a small number of suppliers.

Furthermore As the production capability of Korean fifth-generation LCD panel plants is growing faster than plants in Taiwan, Korean makers will have a higher degree of control over LCD panel prices. The resultant prices that can be offered to customers will improve their notebook PC businesses. In the long run, the manufacture of notebook PCs will come to be dominated by Korean and Greater Chinese makers.

As product differentiation between notebook PCs melts away, pricing is progressively becoming the key competitive factor. Recently, notebook PC manufacturers have drastically cut prices to win orders from the new HP, and although this method will serve to shrink manufacturers' profit margins, it is an unavoidable reality for makers hoping to gain HP's attention.

With superior economies of scale, large notebook PC manufactures such as Quanta and Compal have greater flexibility in price negotiation, which will aid these makers in staying farther ahead of the competition. However, given the large scale of production that can be won from HP, the resultant competition has engendered negotiated prices that are rather out of the ordinary. Similarly, Inventec and Arima, which have been heavily reliant on Compaq for so long, will undoubtedly see a considerable drop in production if the new HP decides not to outsource to them. These two companies have thus been forced to make concessions in pricing. As for other makers that have not fostered a manufacturing relationship with the new HP, price will be the best way to attract orders from this giant.

List of Companies

 

Acer

宏碁

Alphatop

致勝

AMD (Advanced Micro Device

 

Apple

 

Arima

華宇

ASUS

華碩

Clevo

藍天電腦

Best Buy

 

Compal

仁寶

Compaq

 

Dell

戴爾

Dogong

達功

ECS (Elitegroup Computer Systems)

精英

FIC (First International Computer)

大眾

Foxconn

鴻海

Fujitsu-Siemens

 

Hitachi

 

HP

惠普

IBM (International Business Machine)

 

Intel

 

Inventec

英業達

Inventec

英業達

Legend

聯想

Mitac International

神達

Mitac Technology

神基

NEC

 

Quanta

廣達

Sony

 

Sotec

 

Tech-Front (Shanghai) Computer Co., Ltd.

達豐

Toshiba

 

Twinhead

倫飛

Uniwill

志合

Wistron

緯創

List of Industrial Zones

 

Kunshan Industrial Park Export Processing Zone

昆山出口加工區

Shanghai Caohejing Hi-Tech Park

上海漕河涇開發區

Shanghai Songjiang Export Processing Zone

上海松江加工出口區

Singapore Industrial Park

新加坡園區

Suzhou New District

蘇州新區

 

 

 

 

To get MIC's complete insight, please log in.